Company Overview
Berry Corporation functions as an independent upstream energy entity focused on operations within the western United States, specifically utilizing two distinct business segments: Exploration and Production and Well Servicing and Abandonment. The company is classified within the Energy sector and the Oil & Gas E&P industry, positioning it as a provider of crude oil and natural gas extraction services alongside specialized well maintenance solutions. As of December 18, 2025, the firm's market capitalization stands at $253.00M, and it employs a workforce of 1070 individuals to support its upstream activities. These valuation figures and operational metrics indicate that Berry Corporation operates as a mid-tier player in the energy landscape, reflecting a scale that allows for significant regional presence while maintaining a relatively modest capitalization compared to major integrated oil giants. The acquisition by California Resources Corporation as of December 18, 2025, marks a pivotal structural change in the company's ownership history, effectively transitioning its status from an independent entity to a subsidiary within a larger portfolio.
Financial Health
The financial statements for Berry Corporation currently show N/A for Revenue (TTM), Net Income (TTM), and EBITDA, indicating that these specific performance metrics are not disclosed or available in the current reporting cycle. Consequently, a direct analysis of the gap between revenue and net income to reveal cost structure details cannot be performed due to the absence of these foundational figures. Similarly, the free cash flow figure is listed as N/A, which prevents a definitive assessment of the company's financial flexibility to fund capital expenditures or return capital to stakeholders during this period. All three margin metrics—Gross Margin, Operating Margin, and Profit Margin—are reported as N/A, leaving the efficiency of the company's production costs and overall profitability unquantifiable in this dataset. The comparison between total cash and total debt is also impossible to execute as both Cash and Debt figures are unavailable, meaning the Debt to Equity ratio of N/A does not provide insight into whether the balance sheet is conservative or leveraged. Furthermore, the Current Ratio is N/A, so it is not possible to determine the company's short-term liquidity position or its ability to meet obligations due within a year. Finally, the Return on Equity and Return on Assets are both listed as N/A, which means management effectiveness regarding the generation of returns on invested capital cannot be evaluated based on the provided data points.
Valuation Assessment
The trailing P/E ratio and forward P/E ratio are both listed as N/A, which precludes any analysis regarding the difference between them or what such a difference might imply about an expected earnings trajectory. The price-to-book ratio is also N/A, meaning there is no data available to indicate whether the market is pricing the stock at a premium or discount relative to its book value. Additionally, the price-to-sales ratio and EV/EBITDA are reported as N/A, so these alternative valuation metrics cannot be utilized to suggest how the market values the company's revenue generation or earnings power. Despite the lack of traditional valuation multiples, the stock's price action is bounded by a 52-week high of $5.09 and a 52-week low of $2.11, providing a visible range for historical price volatility. The current price sits somewhere within this $2.98 range defined by the high and low, though the specific trading price is not provided to calculate the exact percentage distance from the high or low. The Beta value is recorded as 0.83, which indicates that the stock's price volatility is expected to move at approximately 17% less intensity than the broader market benchmark, suggesting a lower sensitivity to market swings compared to a standard equity index.
Growth & Income
The revenue growth year-over-year and earnings growth year-over-year figures are both listed as N/A, making it impossible to state specific growth rates or explain whether earnings are expanding faster or slower than revenue. Because the dividend yield is stated as 3.7%, the company is identified as a dividend payer, though the payout ratio is N/A, which limits the ability to fully assess the sustainability of the payout relative to earnings. With the payout ratio unavailable, one cannot definitively conclude whether the dividend is funded by cash flow or retained earnings, but the existence of the yield confirms a commitment to income distribution. The overall growth and income profile is currently characterized by a confirmed dividend yield of 3.7% but lacks disclosed data on revenue expansion, earnings growth, or the specific mechanics of capital allocation between dividends and reinvestment.